Extruded Aluminum Heatsink vs Die-Cast Heatsink: Which Wins?
When you’re designing thermal solutions, choosing between extruded and die-cast aluminum heatsinks can be tricky. Both have benefits—but which suits your needs best?
Extrusion usually offers better thermal performance and flexibility at lower tooling cost, while die casting excels in shape complexity and volume production.
Let’s dig into performance, cost, production suitability, and manufacturing precision.
1. How Do Thermal Performance Results Differ?
Thermal performance hinges on conductivity, fin density, and airflow.
- Extruded heatsinks use alloys like 6063/6061 with thermal conductivity ~160–205?W/m·K .
- Die-casts often use ADC12/ZL102 alloys with lower conductivity (~120–155?W/m·K) .
Extrusions have clean, dense fins and no porosity—providing up to 23–53% better cooling than castings .
Thermal Comparison Table
Feature | Extruded Heatsink | Die-Cast Heatsink |
---|---|---|
Thermal Conductivity | ~160–215?W/m·K | ~120–155?W/m·K |
Fin Density | High (thin & close fins) | Moderate, due to cooling needs |
Porosity | None | Possible in casting molds |
Thermal Performance | Best-in-class | Adequate for moderate loads |
Extruded heat sinks dissipate heat more effectively than die-cast ones.True
Higher thermal conductivity and fin density in extrusions lead to better performance.
Die-cast heatsinks outperform extrusions thermally.False
Die-cast alloys and porosity reduce thermal efficiency compared to extrusion.
2. What Are the Cost Implications?
Cost analysis includes tooling, unit price, and processing.
- Extrusion tooling: ~$5K–7.5K per die.
- Die casting tooling: $50K–100K+ molds, long lead times .
- Unit cost: Extrusions may need secondary machining—adding expense. Die cast can yield net-shape parts for less unit machining.
Cost Comparison Table
Factor | Extrusion | Die Casting |
---|---|---|
Tooling Cost | Low–Medium (~\$6K) | High (\$50K–100K+) |
Lead Time | Moderate (weeks) | Long (1–2 months) |
Unit Cost (small run) | Lower (die shared) | Higher due to tooling amortization |
Unit Cost (high volume) | Competitive | Very low once amortized |
Need for Post-Processing | Common (drilling, milling) | Often minimal thanks to net shape |
Extrusion tooling is cheaper than die-casting molds.True
Extrusion dies cost a fraction of casting molds and can be used immediately.
Die casting has lower per-part cost in high volumes.True
Once mold is paid for, high-volume parts have minimal extra machining cost.
Die-cast heatsinks always cost less than extruded ones.False
Initial tooling and lower thermal performance can make die-cast more expensive unless volumes are very high.
3. Which Suits Custom vs Mass Production?
Your production volume and shape complexity decide which process to use:
- Extrusion is ideal for custom profiles and medium volumes due to low tooling costs and fast turnaround (~2 weeks for dies) .
- Die casting fits high volumes and complex geometries, but entails long tooling (30–45 days) and higher upfront cost.
Production Suitability Table
Requirement | Extrusion | Die Casting |
---|---|---|
Profiles & fins | Excellent | Limited |
Integrated features (mounts) | Needs secondary machining | Can include in mold |
Volume | Low–Medium | High volume, >10K units |
Shape complexity | Simple to moderate | Very complex shapes |
Lead time | Shorter (1–3 weeks) | Longer (1–2 months) |
Extrusion is better for custom heatsink designs.True
Lower tooling cost and quicker die turnaround allow for flexible one-offs and prototyping.
Die casting is suitable for low-volume custom heatsinks.False
High tooling costs and long lead times make it impractical for small batches.
4. How Do Manufacturing Tolerances Compare?
Accuracy matters when heatsinks must align with fasteners or electronic components:
- Die casting offers finer tolerances (CT4–CT5) and true net-shape output :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}.
- Extrusion yields consistent cross-sections but needs secondary machining for tight features (~±0.2?mm typical) :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}.
Tolerance Table
Feature | Extrusion | Die Casting |
---|---|---|
Cross?section consistency | Excellent | Good |
Critical holes/features | Requires machining | Often built into mold |
Dimensional tolerance | Moderate (±0.1–0.5?mm) post-machining | High (CT4–CT5 passive tolerance) |
Surface finish | Smooth, anodized | Smooth with minor casting marks |
Die-cast heatsinks can avoid machining by molding holes directly.True
Die-cast molds can include mounting holes and bosses during casting.
Extruded heatsinks always meet tight dimensional tolerances.False
They often need secondary machining to meet tight tolerance specs.
Summary Table
Factor | Extruded Heatsink | Die-Cast Heatsink |
---|---|---|
Thermal Performance | Very High (no porosity, dense fins) | Good but limited by alloy & fin design |
Cost | Low tooling, medium volume friendly | High tooling, best at high volume |
Custom Shapes | Good for simple/moderate shapes | Excellent for complex integrated shapes |
Volumes | Low–Medium suitability | Ideal for large-scale production |
Tolerances | Moderate (secondary machining often needed) | High (net-shape and precise) |
Lead Time | Weeks | Months |
What Should You Choose?
-
Pick extrusion if:
- You need high thermal efficiency
- Volume is low to medium
- Simple fins with optional post-machining work
- Faster and cheaper upfront tooling
-
Pick die casting if:
- You require intricate 3D shapes or integrated features
- Volume is high (avoid costs of machining large numbers)
- Precision and minimal post-processing are essential
-
Hybrid design? Consider combining profiles with machined parts or bonded components for optimized function.
Quiz Yourself
Die-cast heatsinks usually have more precise integrated features than extruded ones.True
Die casting molds can form holes, bosses, and shapes directly during casting.
Extruded heatsinks always outperform die-cast ones thermally.False
Although extrusion performs better thermally, specific design and fin geometry can make high-performance die-casts comparable.
Conclusion
- Extruded heatsinks deliver superior thermal performance, fast tooling, and flexibility—best for custom and medium-volume runs.
- Die-cast heatsinks excel in complex shapes and strict tolerances, and shine when producing large quantities.
- Choose based on thermal needs, design complexity, volume, and budget constraints—you’ll always find a clear winner for your project.
Need help evaluating a specific part or thermal load? Just share the details—I’ll help you pick the perfect solution.